|
| Author Info |
Message |
| TheHaxor |
|
|
OP points: 27
Reply points: 1,754
|
Who else is going to be celebrating his Iowa victory on January 3rd?
_________________
The Haxor KAWK SMASHES!
Niggers With Attitude [nWa] |
|
| Bacon! |
|
OP points: 24
Reply points: 3,127
Location: West Coast
|
Lol.
|
| Yossarian |
|
OP points: 13
Reply points: 1,011
|
TheHaxor wrote: Who else is going to be celebrating his Iowa victory on January 3rd? Barack Obama for one.
_________________
Rejected Guild Names: We Use Apply Poisson[dist] Cognitive Dissidents[cd] Ascalonian Dental Association[ADA] A Wendigo Ate Your Baby [nom] |
|
| tr4v15 |
|
OP points: 7
Reply points: 1,431
Location: Dieing in your backline.
|
If he wins the election for president I'm moving to some third world country.
|
| Snuff |
|
OP points: 15
Reply points: 457
|
Yossarian wrote: Barack Obama for one. HOLY FUCKING SHIT CALISTA GINGRICH IS CREEPY AS FUCK The Repuglican field is such a total joke. You've got 7--sorry, 6--characters that range from toys in the attic batshit crazy to just plain stupid. Then there's Mittens, who is so unappealing to Christians that they've been desperately sifting through the other morons for someone that can sling enough Christian platitudes at them to enable the Christians to hold their noses and give away the most powerful branch of government to the Missing Link. Better hope Obama wins for the sake of us all. I certainly do.
|
| Miths Bane |
|
OP points: 45
Reply points: 1,335
Location: Vermont
|
Lol. Romney dominated the invisible primary; it's going to take a miracle for him not to win the nomination. If Paul somehow pulls out a win it is irrelevant.
_________________
I never asked for this. |
|
| David Holtzman |
|
| Site Admin
OP points: 14
Reply points: 2,580
|
Ron Paul is the best republican candidate by virtue of being so crazy that it actually comes full circle into some good ideas.
_________________
Squidget wrote: Actually, a recent study echoed in several peer reviewed journals shows that disagreeing with David Holtzman increases your chance of being a moron by 62.5%. |
|
| Snuff |
|
OP points: 15
Reply points: 457
|
I'm pretty sure Romney is playing it carefully. He's got to be fully aware that Christians hate him for being in some sort of Jesusy cult with golden tableware or something, so he's kinda sitting back, drinking noncaffeinated beverages, and waiting for the rest of Romper Room (look it up babies) to implode around him. Then he'll still have most of his campaign money left, and he comes out of the primary mostly intact. The problem is that Mittens has put in a bit too much effort into appealing to the batshit groups with garbage like this: Mittens wrote: "We have to cut back on the scale of the federal government," Romney declared. "And for me that will start by reducing federal employees by 10 percent. You do that through attrition."
"And then something else that is just as important, and that's to make sure the people who work for government don't get better pay and better benefits than people that work in the private sector."
"The taxpayers shouldn't have to have money taken out of their pay checks to pay people in government who are our servants who are making a lot more money than we are." 1.) Uh, way to get rid of a couple thousand jobs when we need more jobs, fucko! 2.) Pretty sure government work nearly always pays less than equivalent work at a large corporation 3.) What? Isn't that what taxes are for? Here is a very fair and unbiased breakdown of the Republican field: - Bachmann: Batshit, and her husband would make an awful first lady. - Perry: Sorry Texas, we already tried one of your governors, and look how that turned out. You can keep this one. Nice hair though. - Santorum: Google his name. Look at anything he did while in Congress and then have a good laugh. - Gingrich: You were a stupid dick in the 90s, you're an even bigger dick now. And your wife is made of plastic. Oh, and Fuck You. - Cain: Bye! Too much groping of unreceptive women. - Paul: Americans like a little Libertarianism, but holy shit, man. - Huntsman: What, a Republican with an IQ over 56? I don't believe it. Apparently Mormons aren't regarded as Christians. Huntsman is probably the best candidate they have if you enjoy having paved roads and running water, you elitist pricks. - Romney: Looks waffley and weak to GOP Christians. See above for the Mormon thing. Will probably get the nomination due to sheer persistence, or maybe he'll get the nod so we can finally be rid of him when President Obama smashes his face in next year. EDIT: FIXED TYPO
Last edited by Snuff on Dec 24 2011, 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Stevo |
|
OP points: 43
Reply points: 261
|
ITS CHRISTMAS EVE NOOB AMERIKANZ TALKING ABOUT POLITIKS GO TO BED SANTA ARRIVING SHORTLY WITH YOUR COAL
_________________
"there's no external way to tell when a woman is ready to conceive" - devin townsend  |
|
| Yossarian |
|
OP points: 13
Reply points: 1,011
|
I'm basically with Snuff on this one.
_________________
Rejected Guild Names: We Use Apply Poisson[dist] Cognitive Dissidents[cd] Ascalonian Dental Association[ADA] A Wendigo Ate Your Baby [nom] |
|
| MMSDome |
|
OP points: 46
Reply points: 1,996
|
It's amazing that there are so many contenders for the Republican nominee yet there are no people suitable for the position. I like to believe I am a die hard conservative but if Ron Paul some how manages to get the nomination I will vote for Obama (I won't be one of those fucking faggot as dumb fuck dick jews that say they won't vote at all). O and Donald Trump entering as a 3rd party candidate puts the final nail in the coffin for the Republicans. Time to start campaigning for 2016! Yossarian wrote: TheHaxor wrote: Who else is going to be celebrating his Iowa victory on January 3rd? Barack Obama for one. This made me lol.
|
| Act X |
|
OP points: 82
Reply points: 6,866
Location: QQ Forums bro
|
2016 will be even harder, because the Democrats get to try to throw someone competent into the ring as well.
_________________
Act.2613 - Stormbluff Isle - "Act X" 80 Engi - ActLOL on League  |
|
| Yossarian |
|
OP points: 13
Reply points: 1,011
|
MMSDome wrote: O and Donald Trump entering as a 3rd party candidate puts the final nail in the coffin for the Republicans. Time to start campaigning for 2016! I doubt Trump even gets 1% of the vote. The worst sign for the GOP is the failure of anyone other than Romney and Paul to get on the Virginia primary ballot. If you can't get 10,000 signatures in Virginia, you don't deserve to win.
_________________
Rejected Guild Names: We Use Apply Poisson[dist] Cognitive Dissidents[cd] Ascalonian Dental Association[ADA] A Wendigo Ate Your Baby [nom] |
|
| MMSDome |
|
OP points: 46
Reply points: 1,996
|
Yossarian wrote: MMSDome wrote: O and Donald Trump entering as a 3rd party candidate puts the final nail in the coffin for the Republicans. Time to start campaigning for 2016! I doubt Trump even gets 1% of the vote. The worst sign for the GOP is the failure of anyone other than Romney and Paul to get on the Virginia primary ballot. If you can't get 10,000 signatures in Virginia, you don't deserve to win. A third party candidate ith similar views to either side is never a good thing and usually costs one candidate the election. That 1% could be crucial in the election.
|
| TheHaxor |
|
|
OP points: 27
Reply points: 1,754
|
David Holtzman wrote: Ron Paul is the best republican candidate by virtue of being so crazy that it actually comes full circle into some good ideas. Agreed. Yossarian wrote: TheHaxor wrote: Who else is going to be celebrating his Iowa victory on January 3rd? Barack Obama for one. Oh, because he's done so much over the past four years to warrant an additional four? On a separate note, you guys do realize that all the other candidates are essentially the same candidate, right? Quote: Unlike many political candidates, Paul receives the overwhelming majority of his campaign contributions from individuals (97 percent during the 2006 cycle), and receives much less from political action committees (PAC's) than others, ranging from two percent (2002) to six percent (1998). The group Clean Up Washington, analyzing from 2000 to mid-2006, listed Paul as seventh-lowest of PAC receipts of all House members; one of the lowest in lobbyist receipts; and fourth-highest in small-donor receipts. He had the lowest PAC receipts percentage of all the 2008 Republican presidential candidates. If you don't understand the significance of that quote, then go look up the term "political action committee."
_________________
The Haxor KAWK SMASHES!
Niggers With Attitude [nWa] |
|
|
|